Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of
a self-reported periodontal disease measure for use in the Health Pro
fessionals Follow-up Study. Methods: Participating dentists responded
to the question ''Have you had periodontal disease with bone loss?'' R
adiographs obtained from 140 participants were evaluated for bone loss
at 32 posterior sites and used as the standard. A site was positive i
f it had bone loss 12 mm and/or complete loss of crestal lamina dura.
To avoid falsely classifying participants as positive, three blinded e
xaminers independently evaluated each participant's radiographs. An a
priori decision rule was used to classify a participant positive if al
l examiners independently assessed the same two or more sites positive
. Results: The validity of the self-reported measure was good among de
ntists, with positive and negative predictive values of 0.76 and 0.74,
respectively. Among nondentists, the self-reported measure showed dis
criminately power by confirming associations with known risk factors s
uch as age and smoking. Conclusions: Dentists have a good perception o
f their periodontal status, and there is reasonable consensus among de
ntists regarding the threshold for defining periodontal disease. Self-
reported measures might have potential for use in studies of other pop
ulations with substantial cost reduction, and deserve further evaluati
on.