ADHESION FORMATION AFTER INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR - A RANDOMIZED PORCINE TRIAL

Citation
Pm. Cristoforoni et al., ADHESION FORMATION AFTER INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR - A RANDOMIZED PORCINE TRIAL, The American surgeon, 62(11), 1996, pp. 935-938
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00031348
Volume
62
Issue
11
Year of publication
1996
Pages
935 - 938
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1348(1996)62:11<935:AFAIHR>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Adhesion formation involving intraperitoneal contents is a significant complication of incisional hernia repair. We evaluated the rate of pe ritoneal adhesion formation following closure of experimentally induce d large ventral fascial defects using selected synthetic prosthetic ma terials in a well standardized porcine model. Sixty 25 kg hogs had a 4 x 6 cm ventral fascial defect induced and were randomized to repair w ith either interrupted O-Prolene(R) suture, Marlex(R) surgical mesh (M x), GoreTex Dual Mesh(R) (Gore-DM), or an experimental version of the latter having multiple 0.4 mm fenestrations (Gore-DMH). Mr mesh induce d significantly more adhesions than did Gore-DM when the two materials were placed in a comparable manner (P < 0.001). Those animals whose d efects were closed primarily with Prolene(R) suture alone developed si gnificantly fewer adhesions than either Mr or Gore-DM (with or without holes) when these materials were sutured in an overlaying (i.e., extr aperitoneal) manner (Mx, P < 0.0001; Gore-DM, P < 0.05; Gore-DMH, P < 0.01). The intraperitoneal placement of the Gore-DM materials (i.e., u nderlay manner) resulted in a rate of adhesion formation that was not statistically different from that induced by closure with Prolene(R) a lone (P = 0.08 for Gore-DM and P = 0.07 for Gore-DMH). Our findings su pport the use of Gore-DM biomaterial as the preferred material in the repair of large abdominal fascial defects when the use of a synthetic prosthetic material is necessitated by the defect size.