Fe. Block et C. Schaaf, AUDITORY ALARMS DURING ANESTHESIA MONITORING WITH AN INTEGRATED MONITORING-SYSTEM, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 13(2), 1996, pp. 81-84
Alarms in the operating room remain a major source of annoyance and co
nfusion. A previous study by Kestin et al. utilized a specific combina
tion of distinct, separate monitors in SO pediatric patients. He repor
ted a mean of 10 alarms per case with a mean frequency of one alarm ev
ery 4.5 minutes. The alarms were classified as spurious (75%), change
outside the alarm limits (22%), or patient risk (3%). We performed a s
imilar study with 50 adult patients under general anesthesia with defa
ult alarm settings on an integrated monitor, (Cardiocap(TM), Datex, He
lsinki). In our study, the number of alarms averaged 3 per case with a
mean frequency of one every 34 minutes. Spurious alarms (those caused
by electrocautery, accidental patient movement, or other non-physiolo
gical reasons) represented only 24% of all alarms. Those alarms soundi
ng that were outside the limits occurred at a rate of 53%, and those t
hat were considered patient risks occurred at a rate of 23%. Of the al
arms, 67% occurred during the beginning and end of anesthesia. The end
-tidal carbon dioxide accounted for 42% of the alarms, mostly during i
ntubation and extubation. Suggestions are made for further improvement
in alarm systems.