EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MEASUREMENT FOR TALL PLANT CANOPIES - THE SWEET SORGHUM CASE

Authors
Citation
G. Rana et N. Katerji, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MEASUREMENT FOR TALL PLANT CANOPIES - THE SWEET SORGHUM CASE, Theoretical and applied climatology, 54(3-4), 1996, pp. 187-200
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN journal
0177798X
Volume
54
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
187 - 200
Database
ISI
SICI code
0177-798X(1996)54:3-4<187:EMFTPC>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
A methodological study on a tall canopy in a Mediterranean region was carried out in order to identify the most suitable method for measurin g the actual evapotranspiration (ET). ET from a sweet sorghum crop was measured by 4 different methods: (i) energy balance/eddy correlation, (ii) energy balance/Bowen ratio, (iii) energy balance/aerodynamic sim plified, and (iv) floating lysimeter (ETmeter). In order to compare a very large range of ET values and to reduce experimental errors due to low gradients of air humidity and temperature, the crop was submitted to two soil drying-wetting cycles. To evaluate the main limitations o f each method with respect to crop height, crop ET was monitored durin g the entire vegetative cycle, from stem elongation (crop height 0.85 m, full canopy) to grain filling (when the crop was 2.5 m high). The c omparison between the micrometeorological methods (i, ii, and iii) was made on hourly and daily time steps, while the analysis of ETmeter me asurements was made on a daily time step only. On an hourly scale: edd y correlation ET was 106% of Bowen ratio ET and simplified aerodynamic ET was 116%, 125% and 135% of Bowen ratio ET with the first sensors a re placed at the top of the canopy and the second sensors at 0.7m, 1.4 m and 2.8m from the first sensors, respectively. On a daily scale: edd y correlation ET was 102% of Bowen ratio ET, simplified aerodynamic wa s 114% of Bowen ratio ET and ETmeter ET was 97% of Bowen ratio ET. In the last case the values are very widely spread and the correlation is really not so good. The results show that the Bowen ratio method and the eddy correlation method are in good agreement on daily scales, how ever, certain precautions, must be taken concerning the eddy correlati on method on an hourly scale. The simplified aerodynamic method failed when crop height was > 1.5 m and the ETmeter failed under windy condi tions (wind speed > 2.0 m/s) and limited crop water conditions.