Three preservative treatments were compared for their effects on bioma
ss of macrobenthic species collected at Biloxi Bay, Mississippi. We te
sted the hypothesis that biomass did not differ among treatments once
specimens. were fixed in 10% formalin. Two commonly used analyses, wet
-weight biomass and dry-weight biomass, were tested, Wet-weight variat
ions among treatments were compared over time. Dry-weight calculations
were not possible on individuals over time because specimens could be
dried only once, so ratios of dry weight to wet weight were calculate
d on specimens at the conclusion of each treatment, Specimens were fix
ed in 10% formalin for 2 wk, then transferred to either 1% formalin or
70% ethanol, or left in 10% formalin. Wet-weight biomass of the three
treatments was determined weekly four times, and then specimens were
dried for 72 h at 60 degrees C for dry-weight determinations. Biomass
of most taxa lived in formalin and preserved in ethanol or formalin di
d not vary significantly in wet weight over time. Minor variations amo
ng the treatments occurred in dry-weight biomass. Whereas previous inv
estigators found that ethanol affected biomass when specimens were not
formalin-fixed, our results supported the premise that three commonly
used preservative treatments did not differ in their effects on bioma
ss of estuarine macrobenthos. Therefore, ive propose that estuarine ma
crobenthos be fixed in formalin, then transferred to ethanol for bioma
ss procedures in order to avoid exposure of laboratory personnel to ca
rcinogenic formalin.