Pj. Kumar et al., REHABILITATION AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - A COMPARISON OF 2 REHABILITATION TECHNIQUES, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (331), 1996, pp. 93-101
This study was conducted to compare postoperative total knee arthropla
sty rehabilitation protocols. The hypothesis of this study was that pa
tients undergoing total knee arthroplasty could achieve range of motio
n and hospital discharge in the same period using a postoperative reha
bilitation protocol that did not use a continuous passive motion machi
ne, This randomized prospective study compared 46 total knee arthropla
sties in which a continuous passive motion machine was used with 37 to
tal knees that were rehabilitated with early passive flexion of the kn
ee (named drop and dangle protocol). Postoperative physical therapy re
gimens were otherwise the same for both groups, Surgical technique was
the same for both groups except for closure which was performed in th
e drop and dangle group with the knee at 90 degrees to 95 degrees flex
ion. Only patients with osteoarthritis were included in the study, and
in both groups of patients received the same prosthetic components, P
atients in the drop and dangle group were discharged from the hospital
1 day earlier (p = 0.01) and had a statistically better extension ran
ge of 2.8 degrees at 6 months (p = 0.03), Knees in the drop and dangle
group had less drainage (p = 0.06). Range of motion and hospital disc
harge can be achieved in a similar time interval with the drop and dan
gle technique as with using a continuous passive motion device, and th
at such a device is not required for postoperative knee rehabilitation
.