PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CANCER PAIN IN RURAL MINNESOTA

Citation
L. Lichtblau et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CANCER PAIN IN RURAL MINNESOTA, Journal of pain and symptom management, 12(5), 1996, pp. 283-289
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal","Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
08853924
Volume
12
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
283 - 289
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-3924(1996)12:5<283:PMOCPI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Use of analgesic medications for cancer pain was assessed in six Minne sota communities. In, our survey cancer patients were treated primaril y by family practice physicians. Approximately 70% were given one or m ore analgesics; 84% received a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug and 73% received an opioid. Most patients given an antiinflammatory drug r eceived less than the maximal recommended dose for the drug. The most common opioid for cancer pain was oral morphine. Approximately 40% of the patients treated with opioids took the drug only when needed; the remainder took the drug around-the-clock, with or without additional o pioids for breakthrough pain. Only 14% of patients who received analge sics received a coanalgesic and only 13% received a nonanalgesic adjuv ant. The patterns of analgesic use in these communities corresponded w ell with accepted principles of cancer pain management: liberal use of opioids, use of oral morphine as the predominant agent, and avoidance of meperidine and opioid agonist/antagonists. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Re lief Committee, 1996.