I. Dariansmith et al., MANUAL DEXTERITY - HOW DOES THE CEREBRAL-CORTEX CONTRIBUTE, Clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology, 23(10-11), 1996, pp. 948-956
1. Manual dexterity, of great evolutionary significance to the primate
s, ranges in complexity from the precise opposition of finger and thum
b to Brendal playing Mozart. All dexterity depends on a sustained and
rapid transfer of sensorimotor information between the cerebral cortex
and the cervical spinal cord. 2. Multiple separate corticospinal neur
on populations originate from cortical areas four, the supplementary m
otor area, anterior cingulate, postarcuate, parietal and insular corte
x. Each corticospinal neuron population projects in parallel to all sp
inal segments, and has a distinctive pattern of terminations. 3. Each
corticospinal neuron population has a unique thalamic input which can
relay particular sensorimotor information from the sense organs, cereb
ellum and basal ganglia. The overall structural framework of these sen
sorimotor pathways, with many parallel corticospinal channels, with in
terconnections in the cerebral cortex and spinal cord to enable crosst
alk between the channels, is that needed for parallel distributed proc
essing, which would enable the very rapid transfer of information betw
een the cerebral cortex and spinal cord needed for any sophisticated u
se of the hand. 4. Hemisection of the cervical spinal cord in the maca
que results in an immediate hemiplegia, with subsequent remarkable alt
hough incomplete recovery of hand and finger movements. The only direc
t corticospinal input to the hemicord caudal to the hemisection, even
after 3 years, is the similar to 10% of flbres which cross the midline
caudal to the lesion: the fibres 'spared' by the hemisection, A match
ing 'sparing' of somatosensory input from the paresed limb also occurs
. No regeneration of the interrupted pathways has been visualized usin
g modern tracer techniques. 5. Cervical hemisection permanently reduce
s the number of parallel channels which transmit information between c
ortex acid spinal cord, but does not reduce their cortical origins nor
the neuron populations targeted in the spinal cord. We infer that the
content of the information that can be transmitted between the cortex
and spinal cord is not greatly changed, but the rate of transmission
of this information is sharply reduced, and is the 'bottleneck' that l
imits the complete recovery of dexterity following hemisection. The re
markable recovery that does occur presumably reflects more economic tr
ansmission of information by the few spared channels. We guess that th
is involves substantial synaptic reorganization not visualized by the
procedures we have used.