CHANGING PATTERN OF VALVE SURGERY

Citation
V. Rao et al., CHANGING PATTERN OF VALVE SURGERY, Circulation, 94(9), 1996, pp. 113-120
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System",Hematology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00097322
Volume
94
Issue
9
Year of publication
1996
Supplement
S
Pages
113 - 120
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(1996)94:9<113:CPOVS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Background Advances in surgical technique and perioperative myocardial protection have reduced the risk of aortic and mitral valve surgery. Improved methods of valve repair have reduced the proportion of patien ts who require valve replacement. However, patients who require valve replacement often have advanced disease and/or extensive calcification and may therefore be at increased risk for perioperative morbidity an d mortality. Methods and Results We reviewed the results of 2898 patie nts who underwent aortic (AVR) or mitral (MVR) valve replacement at th e Toronto Hospital. We compared patients who underwent surgery between January 1982 and December 1986 (early group) with those who were oper ated on between January 1989 and December 1993 (late group). The univa riable and multivariable predictors of postoperative low-output syndro me (LOS) and operative mortality (OM) were determined for each time pe riod. A total of 1779 patients underwent AVR (late, n=997; early, n=78 2). Multivariable analyses revealed that the late group had significan tly more patients with independent pre-epidemiology operative risk fac tors for both OM and LOS. Despite the greater proportion of high-risk patients, the incidence of postoperative LOS was lower in the late gro up (10% versus early, 14%; P=.012). There was no difference in OM betw een the two groups (late, 3.4% versus early, 3.7%; P=.732). A total of 1119 patients underwent MVR (late, n=493; early, n=626). Compared wit h the early group, the late group had significantly more patients with preoperative multivariable risk factors for OM and LOS. There was no difference in postoperative LOS (late, 19% versus early, 21%; P=.361) or OM between the two groups (late, 5.8% versus early, 6.9%; P=.432). Conclusions Despite an increase in high-risk patients, there was no si gnificant increase in mortality or morbidity associated with aortic or mitral valve surgery.