Jyl. Reginster, HARMONIZATION OF CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS AND OSTEOPENIA IN EUROPE - A DIFFICULT CHALLENGE, Calcified tissue international, 59, 1996, pp. 24-29
Europe is a patchwork of various medical cultures and financial resour
ces. Variations abound with respect to financing, accessibility to pub
lic health systems, health expenditures, drug registration and reimbur
sement, the prescription of drugs, and clinical applications, as well
as the perception of osteoporosis itself. However, there are possibili
ties for the harmonization of medical services among the various count
ries within Europe. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicina
l Products (EAEMP) is attending to the centralized or decentralized pr
ocedures for the registration of drugs. The Group for the Respect of E
thics and Excellence in Science (GREES) is investigating guidelines fo
r drug registration as well as gathering and making available medical
references. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases
(EFFO) is increasing awareness of the prevalence of the disease and t
he need for prevention and treatment. Finally, the International Feder
ation of Societies on Skeletal Diseases (IFSSD) is coordinating epidem
iologic, clinical, and social research. There is a need for increased
awareness of osteoporosis throughout Europe. Health authorities are in
need of cost/benefit reports leading to the registration and reimburs
ement of agents. Primary care physicians need information about osteop
orosis and need to become involved in the diagnosis and science of the
disease. Awareness needs to be generated among specialists; they need
to be educated in the latest techniques for diagnosis and treatment.
Finally, the general population needs to become aware of osteoporosis
and to be encouraged to participate in the prevention and treatment of
this disease. Current screening and detection in Europe is being done
by densitometry. However, other techniques on the horizon include ult
rasound and biochemical markers. Primary prevention, i.e., maximizing
peak bone mass, includes examining the genetics of osteoporosis to det
ermine the high-risk population and promoting reasonable physical exer
cise and dietary/life-style habits (e.g., increased calcium and avoida
nce of tobacco). Secondary prevention includes the identification of h
igh-risk groups through risk factors, biochemical markers, and densito
metry and adherence to the World Health Organization definition of ost
eopenia-osteoporosis (adapted to financial concerns by GREES guideline
s). Other therapies include hormone replacement agents (although there
are risks for cancer and concerns about durability), calcium and othe
r inhibitors of bone resorption, physical activity, and vitamin D prop
hylaxis in the elderly. Treatment of established or severe osteoporosi
s includes drugs upon availability (inhibitors of bone resorption and
stimulators of bone formation), surgery, and experimental approaches.