PULSED DOSE-RATE (PDR) BRACHYTHERAPY OF ANAL CARCINOMA

Citation
H. Roed et al., PULSED DOSE-RATE (PDR) BRACHYTHERAPY OF ANAL CARCINOMA, Radiotherapy and oncology, 41(2), 1996, pp. 131-134
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
01678140
Volume
41
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
131 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8140(1996)41:2<131:PD(BOA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background and purpose: With radiotherapy of anal carcinomas, sphincte r preservation can be obtained at survival rates similar to those obta ined with radical surgery. By combining external beam irradiation with interstitial irradiation, superiority over standard external irradiat ion has been obtained. With the introduction of pulsed dose rate equip ment, where a single high activity source moves through catheters, a m ore individualized dose distribution and a further elimination of radi ation exposure to the staff can be achieved. Materials and methods: Be tween June 1993 and November 1994, 17 patients with anal carcinoma (T- 1:4, T-2:4, T-3:6, T-4:3) have been treated at the Finsen Center. The treatment consisted of three-field external irradiation 46 Gy/23 fract ions with five fractions a week to the anal canal and regional pelvic lymph nodes. Seven to 33 days after completion of external irradiation , the tumorspace was given 25.2 Gy PDR brachytherapy with 42 pulses of 0.6 Gy, one pulse every hour. Results: One isolated local recurrence has been noted 13 weeks after implantation. One additional local recur rence was seen in a patient with concomitant hepatic and inguinal recu rrence. In three patients inguinal recurrence had occurred, two of the se patients were irradiated without any further evidence of disease, a nd one patient with a primary advanced tumour, had local failure. So f ar necrosis has been observed in 13 patients within 1-49 weeks (median 16 weeks) after implantation. Eight of these patients required colost omy. No relation was observed between the number of implanted needles and the occurrence of necrosis. Conclusions: The results indicate that the treatment is highly effective, but with substantial toxicity.