PROPOSAL FOR TRANSLATIONAL ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL RADIOLABELED IMMUNOGLOBULIN THERAPY

Citation
Hm. Vriesendorp et al., PROPOSAL FOR TRANSLATIONAL ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL RADIOLABELED IMMUNOGLOBULIN THERAPY, Radiotherapy and oncology, 41(2), 1996, pp. 151-161
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
01678140
Volume
41
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
151 - 161
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8140(1996)41:2<151:PFTAAD>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background and purpose: Radiolabeled immunoglobulin therapy (RIT) can be a selective, effective, low-toxicity outpatient cancer therapy. A c onsensus on the best approach for the preclinical and clinical develop ment of RIT reagents needs to be developed. We report the M.D. Anderso n Cancer Center prior experience in translating RIT from laboratory to clinic for the treatment of Hodgkin's disease and propose a flow diag ram for the development of RIT for other malignancies. Material and me thods: Three different animal models are described: nude mice bearing human tumor xenografts, normal beagle dogs, and normal rhesus monkeys. We produced and purified antibodies and prepared chelate-immunoconjug ates reactive with six different human rumor-associated antigens. The Igs used were derived from rabbits, mice, and humans (human-derived RI T reagents being less immunogenic in human patients). Eighty patients with refractory Hodgkin's disease were treated with radiolabeled antif erritin. Results: We recommend a two-injection scheme using, (1) an in dium-111-labeled radioimmunoconjugate for diagnosis, pharmacokinetic s tudies, and dosimetry, and (2) a yttrium-90-labeled radioimmunoconjuga te for therapy. The animal models provide useful data on tumor targeti ng, radiotoxicology, and undesirable biodistributions. A 70% response rate is obtained in patients with advanced recurrent Hodgkin's disease . More extensive preclinical testing allows for safer and more effecti ve clinical RIT studies. Conclusions: We recommend, (1) preclinical op timization of chelation chemistry, Ig size, Ig origin, route of admini stration, and fractionation, (2) new clinical Phase I-III studies more appropriate for RIT development than the classical Phase I-III studie s used for the development of chemotherapeutic agents, and (3) more ex tensive preclinical testing of RIT reagents.