MONOPOLY, MONOPSONY AND CONTESTABILITY IN HEALTH-INSURANCE - A STUDY OF BLUE-CROSS PLANS

Citation
Se. Foreman et al., MONOPOLY, MONOPSONY AND CONTESTABILITY IN HEALTH-INSURANCE - A STUDY OF BLUE-CROSS PLANS, Economic inquiry, 34(4), 1996, pp. 662-677
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00952583
Volume
34
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
662 - 677
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-2583(1996)34:4<662:MMACIH>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
As dominant sellers of health insurance and buyers of health services, Blue Cross and Blue Shield have potential monopoly and monopsony powe r The credible threat of entry resulting from the increased competitiv eness of these markets in the 1980s may have produced competitive outc omes-reduced prices, improved quality and efficient cost structures-ev en in a concentrated market. We find the plans used economies of scale and monopsony power to reduce administrative costs, provide payments and consumer premiums. Our findings suggest that steps to enhance the contestability of health markets may be a better response than regulat ion.