PROTEIN LOSSES IN CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPIES

Citation
Mh. Mokrzycki et Aa. Kaplan, PROTEIN LOSSES IN CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPIES, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 7(10), 1996, pp. 2259-2263
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
ISSN journal
10466673
Volume
7
Issue
10
Year of publication
1996
Pages
2259 - 2263
Database
ISI
SICI code
1046-6673(1996)7:10<2259:PLICRR>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become a popular treat ment modality but may have the disadvantage of producing substantial p rotein losses. With use of the Biuret method, a relatively insensitive assay, dialysate/ultrafiltrate protein losses have been reported to b e as high as 1.3 g/L. With CRRT outputs of up to 50 L/day, these value s would amount to protein losses of up to 65 g/day. In this study, dia lysate/ultrafiltrate protein losses were reanalyzed by using a highly sensitive microprotein reagent (pyrogallol red) considered to be more accurate than previously available methods. Twenty-two dialysate/ultra filtrate samples were obtained from Amicon-20 Diafilters or Fresenius F-80 dialyzers during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or c ontinuous venovenous hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration (CVVHD/F). Mean ho urly output for all treatments was 1637 +/- 694 mL/h. Mean protein con centration for all 22 dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples was 4.2 +/- 4.0 mg/dL, Mean dialysate/ultrafiltrate protein concentrations were simila r for the Amicon 20 (3.4 +/- 4.4 mg/dL, N = 9) and the Fresenius F-80 (4.7 +/- 3.9 mg/dL, N = 13) (P = not significant). Protein losses were higher during convection-based CVVH (6.0 +/- 5.1 mg/dL, N = 10; range , 1 to 15 mg/dL) than during the mixed convection and diffusion-based CVVHD/F (2.7 +/- 1.9 mg/dL, N = 12; range, 0 to 6 mg/dL) (P = 0.049). Mean serum protein concentration at the time of dialysate/ultrafiltrat e sampling was 4.7 +/- 1.8 g/dL. There was a weak, but statistically s ignificant correlation between the dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples and the corresponding value for serum protein (r = 0.468, P < 0.03). It w as concluded that protein losses during CRRT treatments are substantia lly lower than previously reported, are dependent on the serum protein concentration and the predominant nature of solute removal (convectio n versus diffusion), and can vary between 1.2 and 7.5 g/day.