Ad. Tates et al., BIOLOGICAL EFFECT MONITORING IN INDUSTRIAL-WORKERS FROM THE CZECH-REPUBLIC EXPOSED TO LOW-LEVELS OF BUTADIENE, Toxicology, 113(1-3), 1996, pp. 91-99
Blood samples were collected twice(in 1993 and 1994) from 19 workers e
xposed to 1,3-butadiene and 19 matched controls. Three exposed and thr
ee control subjects were the same in 1993 and 1994. Personal passive d
osimetry was performed in 1993 and twice in 1994 on the day preceding
blood sampling. Mean exposure level in 1994 was 1.76 +/- 4.20 ppm (S.D
.) and individual exposure levels ranged between 0.012 ppm (detection
limit) and 19.77 ppm. Using the clonal assay, geometric mean of hprt m
utant frequencies adjusted for cloning efficiency, age and smoking wer
e, respectively, 7.85 (+/-7.09) x 10(-6) and 10.14 (+/-9.16) x 10(-6)
in pooled (1993 plus 1994) exposed and control subjects. The differenc
e was not statistically significant indicating that 1,3-butadiene did
not induce a detectable increase in mutations at the hprt locus. A sim
ilar result was obtained for the 1994 subjects alone. There was no dif
ference between adjusted geometric mean mutant frequencies of exposed
and unexposed non-smokers or between exposed and unexposed smokers. An
alysis of chromosomal aberration's in lymphocytes from 1994 subjects i
ndicated that the percentage of aberrant cells was significantly enhan
ced in exposed subjects. In 1993 (data not shown), it was impossible t
o demonstrate a significant increase of aberrant cells in subjects exp
osed to 1,3-butadiene. Frequencies of micronuclei in cytochalasin-B bl
ocked binucleate lymphocytes in exposed and unexposed 1994 subjects we
re not significantly different. This was also the case for earlier sam
ples analyzed in the same plant. Using the comet assay for 1993 subjec
ts, no statistically significant difference was found between the whol
e group of exposed and unexposed subjects. This was true for both the
comet tail length and the percentage of DNA in the tail. In exposed sm
okers, however, the comet tail length was significantly longer than in
unexposed smokers. Unexpectedly, in unexposed smokers the tail length
was significantly shorter than in unexposed non-smokers. It was also
unexpected that the percentage of DNA in the comet tail was significan
tly lower in exposed non-smokers than in unexposed non-smokers.