The traditional travel cost model operates on the assumption that choi
ces are made regarding the number of trips to various sites over an en
tire recreation season. This paper uses actual recreation data to test
the consistency of this model with postulates of rational economic ch
oice as embodied in the axioms of revealed preference. The paper assum
es consumer rationality and examines the effects of alternative trip p
rices and model structures on the degree of consistency between them a
nd the axioms of choice. Using tests developed by Varian and Tsur, the
authors find that site choices at prices proxied by travel costs for
most individuals in the sample violate the axioms. The violations are
quite large when time costs, both in traveling and on-site, are omitte
d from the prices. When they are included, violations are almost as nu
merous, but not as large. The paper also examines demand heterogeneity
by stratifying the sample and repeating the nonparametric tests. Thes
e findings suggest caution be used in interpreting welfare measures de
rived from traditional travel cost models, especially those that do no
t include measures of time value. The authors' approach provides a met
hod for screening travel cost data and preparing for model selection a
nd estimation.