R. Debeun et al., THE CALCIUM-CHANNEL AGONIST BAY K-8644 REDUCES ETHANOL INTAKE AND PREFERENCE IN ALCOHOL-PREFERRING AA RATS, Psychopharmacology, 127(4), 1996, pp. 302-310
Applying a 12-h limited access, two-bottle choice procedure, antialcoh
ol effects of the 1,4-dihydropyridine (DHP) L-type calcium (Ca2+) chan
nel agonist BAY k 8644 were investigated in alcohol-preferring AA rats
. In this Wistar line, selectively bred for a high 10% v/v ethanol (Et
OH) preference in a free choice situation, effects on EtOH preference
and intake, as well as on food and total fluid intake were evaluated f
or racemic BAY k 8644 (0.1-1 mg/kg IP; 0.25-2 mg/kg PO), its agonistic
(-)-enantiomer (0.1-1 mg/kg IP and PO) and its antagonistic (+)-enant
iomer (10-50 mg/kg IP and PO). Irrespective of route of application, B
AY l-e 8644 was found to be effective in reducing both EtOH intake and
preference (minimal effective dose: 0.5O mg/kg; maximum effect: appro
ximately 60% of baseline levels). The (+)-enantiomer, acting as a low-
potency Ca2+ channel antagonist, also reduced EtOH intake and preferen
ce but the effects were not very selective as food intake was also sub
stantially reduced. Moreover, the effects were only obtained at relati
vely high doses (50 mg/kg). The essential enantiomer involved in the a
ntialcohol effects of BAY k 8644 seems to be the (-)-enantiomer, actin
g as a strong Ca2+ channel agonist. This latter compound was potent (m
inimal effective dose: 0.3 mg/kg), very effective in reducing EtOH int
ake (maximum effect: 29% of baseline level) and preference (26% of bas
eline) and apparently more selective. Although slightly decreasing ove
r days, effects of (-)-BAY k 8644 on EtOH intake and preference were s
hown to remain after repealed treatment (10 successive days, 0.3 mg/kg
IP). Interestingly, the acute antialcohol effects of(-)BAY k 8644 (0.
3-1 mg/kg IP) could not be antagonized with the DHP L-type Ca2+ channe
l antagonists nimodipine (0.01-1 mg/kg IP) and (-)-nimodipine (1-30 mg
/kg IP). The present results suggest that a mechanism of action other
than L-type Ca2+ channel agonism is involved in the antialcohol effect
s of (+/-)- and (-)-BAY k 8644. Alternatively, it is possible that the
previously described antialcohol effects of DHP Ca2+ channel antagoni
sts are not related to antagonistic activity at Ca2+ channels. Finally
, it cannot be excluded that a mechanism unrelated to Ca2+ channels is
responsible for the antialcohol effects of both DHP Ca2+ channel agon
ists and antagonists.