Re. Bristow et al., SECONDARY SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION FOR ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER - PATIENT SELECTION AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, Cancer, 78(10), 1996, pp. 2049-2062
BACKGROUND. Standard therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer no
w includes primary cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemo
therapy. Optimal primary debulking is associated with improved clinica
l response rates to primary chemotherapy as well as longer overall sur
vival. The benefits of secondary cytoreductive surgery for persistent
or recurrent ovarian cancer have not been as clearly established as th
ose of primary surgery. METHODS. The English language literature was s
earched, using a MEDLINE database, to identify all clinical investigat
ions pertaining to secondary cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovar
ian cancer. Additional sources were found in reference lists from orig
inal research and review articles. Particular emphasis was placed on t
hose studies allowing secondary operations for ovarian cancer to be gr
ouped into four clinical scenarios: (1) recurrent disease, (2) second-
look laparotomy (SLL), (3) interval cytoreduction, and (4) progressive
disease. RESULTS. Patients with recurrent disease, particularly after
a prolonged disease free interval, may derive a significant survival
benefit from optimal debulking. The available data also indicate that
patients whose disease is in complete clinical remission, with macrosc
opic disease detected at the time of SLL, benefit from cytoreduction t
o microscopic disease residual. Cytoreduction that leaves SLL patients
with a small amount of macroscopic disease may provide some survival
benefit, but the degree of that benefit is unclear. Patients who under
go suboptimal primary debulking and later demonstrate a favorable resp
onse to induction chemotherapy may derive a modest survival advantage
from an optimal interval cytoreductive procedure. CONCLUSIONS. Proper
selection of patients with recurrent or initially suboptimally resecte
d ovarian cancer is essential to maximize the potential therapeutic be
nefit of secondary cytoreductive surgery. (C) 1996 American Cancer Soc
iety.