Ps. Myles et al., HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS, MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA, AND TIMING OF TRACHEAL EXTUBATION WITH PROPOFOL-BASED ANESTHESIA FOR CARDIAC-SURGERY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 84(1), 1997, pp. 12-19
Recent interest in earlier tracheal extubation after coronary artery b
ypass graft (CABG) surgery has focused attention on the potential bene
fits of a propofol-based technique. We randomized 124 patients (34 wit
h poor ventricular function) undergoing CABG surgery to receive either
a propofol-based (5 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1) prior to sternotomy, 3 mg . k
g(-1) . h(-1) thereafter; n = 58) or enflurane-based (0.2%-1.0%, n = 6
6) anesthetic. Induction of anesthesia consisted of fentanyl 15 mu g/k
g and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously in both groups. The enflurane
group received an additional bolus of fentanyl 5 mu g/kg prior to ste
rnotomy and fentanyl 10 mu g/kg with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg at commenceme
nt of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients receiving propofol were e
xtubated earlier (median 9.1 h versus 12.3 h, P = 0.006), although the
re was no difference in time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (b
oth 22 h, P = 0.54). Both groups had similar hemodynamic changes throu
ghout (all P > 0.10), as well as metaraminol (P = 0.49) and inotrope r
equirements (P > 0.10), intraoperative myocardial ischemia (P = 0.12)
and peri-operative myocardial infarction (P = 0.50). The results of th
is trial suggest that a propofol-based anesthetic, when compared to an
enflurane-based anesthetic requiring additional dosing of fentanyl an
d midazolam for CPB, can lead to a significant reduction in time to ex
tubation after CABG surgery, without adverse hemodynamic effects, incr
eased risk of myocardial ischemia or infarction.