SMALL-DOSE PROPOFOL BY CONTINUOUS-INFUSION DOES NOT PREVENT POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING IN FEMALES UNDERGOING OUTPATIENT LAPAROSCOPY

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there is a direct prophylactic antiemetic effect of small-dose propofol given-by continu ous infusion. Sixty female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopy under general anesthesia were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by a constant infusion of 1 mg . kg(-1). h(-1) of propofol or an equivalent volume of 10% Int ralipid((R)) (placebo) beginning 30 min before induction of anesthesia and continuing until discharge from Stage I postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Anesthesia was induced and maintained in a standard fashion in all patients. The number of emetic episodes before and after discharg e from PACU, nausea scores (11-point numerical scale), and time to dis charge were evaluated. No significant differences between Intralipid(( R)) and propofol were found for any of the outcome variables tested. W hile small-dose propofol is an effective adjuvant in reducing chemothe rapy-induced emesis, we were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effe ct of propofol in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting when used as the sole prophylactic medication in this patient population. Propo fol may have a synergistic effect when administered with other antieme tics, or the specific antiemetic effect of propofol, if it exists, may be dose-dependent and the dose used in this study was below the effic acy threshold.