Ja. Myers et al., COMPARISON OF TESTS FOR DETECTING LEAKS IN THE LOW-PRESSURE SYSTEM OFANESTHESIA GAS MACHINES, Anesthesia and analgesia, 84(1), 1997, pp. 179-184
Small leaks in the low-pressure system (LPS) of the anesthesia gas mac
hine can cause hypoxia or patient awareness. We sought to determine th
e relative sensitivities of the various tests recommended for detectin
g LPS leaks before anesthesia. Special adapters were fashioned to crea
te leaks of six different sizes in the LPS that were equivalent to the
following: a single 25-, 22-, 20-, or 15-gauge needle, two 15-gauge n
eedles, or a 2.5-mm endotracheal tube connector. With each leak condit
ion, five different leak tests were performed on three each of the fol
lowing machines: Ohmeda Modulus I(TM), Ohmeda Modulus II(R)-Plus, and
North American Drager Narkomed (2A, 3 and 4), for a total of 54 leaks
to be detected for each leak test (3 x 3 x 6). The number of leaks det
ected with each test was compared by Fisher's exact test P < 0.05 bein
g considered significant. Only the negative pressure leak test detecte
d all 54 leaks, a significant difference from the positive pressure te
st, which detected the least number of leaks, 28 (P < 0.05). Some leak
tests are more suitable for specific anesthesia machines. Adoption of
the negative pressure test as a universal LPS leak test may prevent t
he risks associated with using the wrong test for the particular anest
hesia machine: hypoxic gas or patient awareness.