According to conventional economic wisdom, capital income taxes should
be low. The purpose of this paper is to cast doubt on this general co
nclusion and to show that theory can also point in the opposite direct
ion. The paper shows that under rather mild conditions, higher capital
income taxes lead to faster growth in an overlapping generations econ
omy with endogenous growth. Government expenditures are fixed as a fra
ction of GNP and are financed with labor income taxes as well as capit
al income taxes. Since capital income accrues to the old, taxing it re
liefs the tax burden on the young and leaves them with more income out
of which to save. The net effect on savings is positive, if the inter
est elasticity of savings is sufficiently low, which it seems to be ac
cording to several estimates found in the literature. The basic argume
nt is not seriously challenged by a grandfather clause for initial cap
ital or by the old receiving some labor income as well. Extending the
model to allow for multiple periods of lives, however, can overturn ou
r results and support the conventional wisdom instead.