Analyses of forecasting that assume a constant, time-invariant data ge
nerating process (DGP), and so implicitly rule out structural change o
r regime shifts in the economy, ignore an aspect of the real world res
ponsible for some of the more dramatic historical episodes of predicti
ve failure. Some models may offer greater protection against unforesee
n structural breaks than others, and various tricks may be employed to
robustify forecasts to change. We show that in certain states of natu
re, vector autoregressions in the differences of the variables (in the
spirit of Box-Jenkins time-series modelling), can outperform vector '
equilibrium-correction' mechanisms. However, appropriate intercept cor
rections can enhance the performance of the latter, albeit that reduct
ions in forecast bias may only be achieved at the cost of inflated for
ecast error variances.