DEEP ECOLOGY AND THE IRRELEVANCE OF MORALITY

Authors
Citation
Eh. Reitan, DEEP ECOLOGY AND THE IRRELEVANCE OF MORALITY, Environmental ethics, 18(4), 1996, pp. 411-424
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Philosophy,"Social Issues
Journal title
ISSN journal
01634275
Volume
18
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
411 - 424
Database
ISI
SICI code
0163-4275(1996)18:4<411:DEATIO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Both Arne Naess and Warwick Fox have argued that deep ecology, in term s of ''Self-realization,'' is essentially nonmoral. I argue that the a ttainment of the ecological Self does not render morality in the riche st sense ''superfluous,'' as Fox suggests. To the contrary, the achiev ement of the ecological Self is a precondition for being a truly moral person, both from the perspective of a robust Kantian moral framework and from the perspective of Aristotelian virtue ethics. The oppositio n between self-regard and morality is a false one. The two are the sam e. The ecological philosophy of Naess and Fox is an environmental ethi c in the grand tradition of moral philosophy.