This research assesses the effectiveness of groundwater doctrine in ea
stern Colorado and western Kansas within the context of 330 irrigators
' preferences for perceived changes in groundwater appropriations and
variances in existing rules to best achieve the public interest. A sur
vey of irrigators in six groundwater management districts reveals that
attitudes conflict with several aspects of current appropriation doct
rine. There is significant support for broad-based, uniform reductions
in appropriations when groundwater becomes scarce rather than the ''f
irst in time, first in right'' requirement in the prior appropriation
doctrine. Many irrigators believe that past water-use efficiency shoul
d be a criteria factored into appropriation reduction polices. Most op
pose the ''use it or lose it'' concept that requires specified levels
of beneficial use to protect a water right, and irrigators oppose spec
ial exemptions to permit new wells to benefit the public interest in f
ully appropriated areas. Importantly, if irrigators' preferences were
codified in the groundwater appropriations doctrines, more groundwater
could be conserved.