Sr. Beissinger et al., NULL MODELS FOR ASSESSING ECOSYSTEM CONSERVATION PRIORITIES - THREATENED BIRDS AS TITERS OF THREATENED ECOSYSTEMS IN SOUTH-AMERICA, Conservation biology, 10(5), 1996, pp. 1343-1352
We set ecosystem conservation priorities based on a comparison of obse
rved levels of threat and protection versus expected levels derived fr
om the use of null models. We used differences in the proportion of th
reatened and nonthreatened bird species among ecosystems to assess lev
els of threat and differences in the coverage of parks and protected a
reas relative to land area to assess levels of protection. We applied
this approach to terrestrial biomes of continental South America and d
etermined where recommendations for species and ecosystem conservation
converge and diverge. We calculated the percentage of range in each b
iome for 132 bird species threatened by habitat destruction and 288 no
nthreatened bird species. Three biomes (evergreen forest, broadleaf fo
rest, and cold desert) were not included because few bird ranges fell
primarily within them. Tropical humid forest and mountain biomes suppo
rted the greatest levels of avian species diversity. But only subtropi
cal and temperate rainforests and tropical dry forests supported a hig
her proportion of threatened bird species than expected, making them e
cosystem destruction hotspots. Tropical humid forests and tropical and
temperate grasslands supported lesser proportions of threatened bird
species than expected (i.e., coldspots), whereas mountain and warm des
erts supported similar proportions of threatened and nonthreatened bir
d species (i.e., neutral). These patterns were corroborated by the app
ortionment of human population densities among biomes. Highest densiti
es (>25 per km(2)) occurred in subtropical and temperate rainforests a
nd tropical dry forests, whereas tropical humid forests and warm deser
ts supported the lowest human densities (<1 per km(2)). The largest pr
oportions of protected areas were in tropical humid forest and mountai
n biomes, which is in accord with the distribution of avian diversity
but not with our assessment of habitat destruction. Protected areas we
re especially underrepresented in tropical dry forests, making them th
e most threatened biome.