Da. Darosa et al., DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF THE SURGEONS AS EDUCATORS COURSE, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 183(5), 1996, pp. 499-505
BACKGROUND: Since 1993, the American College of Surgeons has sponsored
an annual 6-day course entitled the Surgeons as Educators, The course
was designed to provide academic surgeons with the knowledge and skil
ls necessary to enhance the surgical education curriculum, teaching st
rategies, educational program administration, and performance evaluati
on, This article describes the development, implementation, and effect
of the course on the classes graduating in 1993 and 1994. STUDY DESIG
N: The effect of the course was studied by using a longitudinal survey
approach, A survey was mailed to participants 3 to 6 months after the
y completed the course, Graduates were asked to describe any education
-related actions taken attributable to attending the Surgeons as Educa
tors course, The quality of course content and presentations were eval
uated by using end-of-course evaluation forms and daily feedback forms
and by an external reviewer. RESULTS: Within 6 months of returning fr
om the course, more than one half of the graduates initiated actions r
elated to curriculum development, teaching strategies, or educational
administration, One third or more of the graduates modified their perf
ormance and program evaluation systems, Using a five-point scale, rati
ng's of the course content ranged from 3.78 to 4.64 for ''value of top
ic'' and from 3.77 to 4.76 for ''quality of presentation.'' Items eval
uated by the graduates on the end-of-course evaluation forms ranged fr
om 7.8 to 8.7 on a nine-point scale. CONCLUSIONS: The Surgeons as Educ
ators course offered an opportunity for participants to interact among
themselves and with course faculty about educational issues and to pr
actice teaching skills, The course was highly rated for educational qu
ality and value, The retreat environment and the length of the program
helped attendees become immersed during this ''protected time'' to an
alyze strengths and weaknesses of their programs and devise achievable
plans to improve their abilities as educators and the effectiveness o
f their programs.