The traditional view based on Darwin and Gause states that taxonomical
ly (and therefore ecologically) closely related species have to exclud
e each other more often than distant ones. Since Jaccard, this fact is
regarded as evidence for species-to-genus ratios (S/G) being lower in
insular or local biotas than in corresponding entire pools. But these
arguments are not convincing, and the opposite point of view (''coexi
sting principle'') also exists. I treat the co-occurrence of congeneri
c species as a statistical phenomenon to be studied on the basis of me
ta-analysis methodology in terms of null-hypothesis testing. According
to this hypothesis, congeners co-occur randomly and independently in
samples from a total species pool. This is verified for various groups
(marine ciliates and polychaetes, fresh-water molluscs and carabid be
etles) using both S/G-ratios and similarity indices. Species lists of
different ecological range (from regional faunas to single samples) ar
e compared with a neutral model of ''random occurrence''. The results
depend significantly on the focus scale. The congeners usually lend to
co-occur more frequently than expected, when habitat types or regions
are treated as sampling units. However, the opposite tendency towards
a separation is revealed on finer ecological scales (local communitie
s or samples). Coexistence of closely related species should be treate
d as a complex scale-dependent phenomenon of niche separation (on the
local level) within the pool of species similar in their environmental
requirements and history (on the regional or biotopical level). The m
ain processes affecting species diversity and distribution (competitio
n, adaptation to the environment and speciation) manifest simultaneous
ly but on different scales, and could mutually compensate each other.
The scale factor should be taken into account to resolve the above con
tradiction (''exclusion or coexistence'').