A. Kiri et al., DETECTION OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA - NIDEK 3DX STEREOPHOTOGRAPHY COMPARED WITH FUNDUS BIOMICROSCOPY, American journal of ophthalmology, 122(5), 1996, pp. 654-662
PURPOSE: To assess the use of the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous stereophotogr
aphy camera in diabetic patients, comparing the detection of clinicall
y significant macular edema by fundus biomicroscopy to detection by th
e Nidek 3Dx simultaneous fundus stereophotograph. METHODS: Two hundred
eight eyes of 123 diabetic patients at the Wilmer Retinal Vascular Ce
nter were examined for this prospective study between August 1993 and
October 1993. Each patient was examined by one of three retina special
ists by contact lens biomicroscopy for clinically significant macular
edema and foveal center thickening. Nidek 3Dx fundus stereophotographs
were obtained and graded independently for clinically significant mac
ular edema and foveal center thickening by a fourth ophthalmologist ma
sked from the clinical examination findings. Percent agreement, kappa
statistic, and weighted kappa statistic were determined for the two di
agnostic methods. RESULTS: One hundred eighty four (88%) of the 208 st
ereophotographs were of sufficient quality to detect clinically signif
icant macular edema; 175 (84%) of the 208 stereophotographs detected f
oveal center thickening. The agreement between the clinician and the p
hotographic grading, measured by weighted kappa, was 0.52 for clinical
ly significant macular edema and 0.58 for foveal center thickening, re
presenting fair to good agreement beyond chance, Agreement was improve
d when normal fundus Nidek stereophotographs were available as standar
ds for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The Nidek 3Dx camera is suitable for p
hotographic detection of clinically significant macular edema and may
have a potential advantage over conventional cameras by achieving good
-quality, gradable stereophotographs ina large proportion of photograp
hed eyes.