Ll. Wall et al., USE OF A PEDICLED RECTUS-ABDOMINIS MUSCLE FLAP SLING IN THE TREATMENTOF COMPLICATED STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 175(6), 1996, pp. 1460-1464
OBJECTIVE: A pedicled rectus muscle flap sling in the treatment of com
plicated stress urinary incontinence was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Thir
ty-two women underwent a combined vaginal and abdominal sling operatio
n for stress incontinence with a pedicled muscle flap developed from t
he rectus abdominis muscle. All operations were performed jointly by t
he same two surgeons. The procedure involved transecting one rectus ab
dominis muscle just above its first tendinous intersection and isolati
ng the muscle as a flap on its inferior vascular pedicle. The muscle f
lap was then swung beneath the urethra and bladder neck, pulled into t
he retropubic space on the contralateral side, and sewn to the obturat
or internus fascia or to Cooper's ligament. All patients undergoing th
e procedure had demonstrable stress incontinence on physical examinati
on and underwent preoperative fluoroscopic video urodynamics. The diag
nosis of complicated stress incontinence was based on the presence of
one or more of the following factors: previous failed antiincontinence
surgery (33 operations in 22 patients, average 1.5 operations), open
vesical neck on fluoroscopy (14 patients), urethral closure pressure l
ess than or equal to 30 cm H2O by the Brown-Wickham technique (16 pati
ents), or massive vaginal prolapse and demonstrable stress incontinenc
e with the prolapse reduced and the urethra supported in a normal posi
tion (16 patients). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 13 months (average 6 mo
nths). Surgical outcome was assessed by physical examination and a det
ailed telephone interview conducted by a physician who was not involve
d in the operations. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (87.5%) were satis
fied with the results of the operation. There were four surgical failu
res (12.5%). Stress incontinence persisted in three patients after sur
gery, and one patient who had mixed incontinence before surgery was cu
red of stress incontinence but continued to have significant urinary l
eakage as a result of detrusor overactivity. There appears to be less
voiding dysfunction with this technique than with other sling procedur
es for stress incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: The sling procedure with a re
ctus abdominis muscle flap appears to be a viable surgical technique i
n the treatment of complicated stress incontinence. Further study is n
eeded to assess the long-term results of this operation and to evaluat
e its proper place in reconstructive pelvic surgery.