Rationale and Objectives. Extraintestinal abnormalities visible withou
t contrast material on abdominal radiographs are reported less frequen
tly when contrast examinations are performed. Gaze dwell time was used
to determine whether this difference is due to failure by observers t
o scan plain-film regions of contrast studies or discounting of plain-
film abnormalities that were actually scanned. Methods. Patients were
included whose contrast studies had elicited the largest reductions in
positive responses compared with their plain-film studies in a previo
us detection experiment. Gaze of 10 radiologists was studied. Results.
Significantly less time was spent gazing at non-contrast regions of c
ontrast examinations than at the corresponding regions of radiographs.
Errors with radiographs were based primarily on failures of recogniti
on and decision making, whereas errors with contrast studies were base
d primarily on faulty scanning. Conclusion. Satisfaction of search err
ors on contrast examinations are caused by reduction in scanning of no
ncontrast regions.