Background and Purpose The value of screening for asymptomatic carotid
stenosis has become an important issue with the recently reported ben
eficial effect of endarterectomy. The purpose of this study is to eval
uate the cost-effectiveness of using Doppler ultrasound as a screening
tool to select subjects for arteriography and subsequent surgery. Met
hods A computer model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness
of screening a cohort of 1000 men during a 20-year period. The primar
y outcome measure was incremental present-value dollar expenditures fo
r screening and treatment per incremental present-value quality-adjust
ed life-year (QALY) saved. Estimates of disease prevalence and arterio
graphic and surgical complication rates were obtained from the literat
ure. Probabilities of stroke and death with surgical and medical treat
ment were obtained from published clinical trials. Doppler ultra soun
d sensitivity and specificity were obtained through review of local ex
perience. Estimates of costs were obtained from local Medicare reimbur
sement data. Results A one-time screening program of a population with
a high prevalence (20%) of greater than or equal to 60% stenosis cost
$35 130 per incremental QALY gained. Decreased surgical benefit or in
creased annual discount rate was detrimental, resulting in lost QALYs.
Annual screening cost $457 773 per incremental QALY gained. In a low-
prevalence (4%) population, one-time screening cost S52 588 per QALY g
ained, while annual screening was detrimental, Conclusions The cost-ef
fectiveness of a one-time screening program for an asymptomatic popula
tion with a high prevalence of carotid stenosis may be cost-effective.
Annual screening is detrimental. The most sensitive variables in this
simulation model were long-term stroke risk reduction after surgery a
nd annual discount rate for accumulated costs and QALYs.