B. Muller et al., GRAMMAR LEARNING AND SERIAL REACTIONS - 2 PARADIGMS - ONE LEARNING MECHANISM, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie, 43(2), 1996, pp. 319-350
Three experiments were carried out to investigate whether implicit eff
ects in the paradigm of grammar learning and in the paradigm of serial
reaction time tasks can be explained by only one strictly associative
learning mechanism, as suggested by Frensch and Miner (1994). Based o
n the theory of finite automata it was possible to construct experimen
tal conditions in which the essential aspects of the two paradigms cou
ld be combined independently. In Experiment 1, sensitivity towards gra
mmatical structure, measured by grammaticality judgments, was found if
subjects had to memorize presented sequences of events in the learnin
g phase (grammar learning). No grammaticality effect was found if, pri
or to the discrimination task, subjects had to react according to sign
aled events in a sequence (serial reaction time task). These differenc
es between learning conditions could be due to differences in the appr
opriateness of learning processes for the test task, thus reflecting a
high degree of specificity of implicitly acquired knowledge. To rule
out this alternative explanation, a second experiment was run, in whic
h the same learning conditions were combined with the task to react as
quickly as possible to signaled events. Comparing the reaction times
of critical transitions between grammatical and non-grammatical sequen
ces revealed a decisive effect of grammaticality for both conditions.
In Experiment 3, it was shown that the effects of Experiment 2 were du
e to the learning conditions, rather than artifacts. The implications
of these findings for mechanisms of learning are discussed.