Dmr. Kelsay et Rs. Tyler, ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES EXPECTED AND REALIZED BY PEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS AS REPORTED BY THEIR PARENTS, The American journal of otology, 17(6), 1996, pp. 866-873
Studies documenting subjective changes in quality of life of pediatric
cochlear implant recipients are limited. In this study, parents of co
chlear implant recipients completed a questionnaire requesting them to
list advantages and disadvantages associated with their children's co
chlear implant use. Preimplantation, benefits expected by parents incl
uded awareness of environmental sounds (89% of parents), improved spee
ch perception (50%), and improved speech production (36%). Disadvantag
es expected included equipment maintenance and repair (21% of parents)
, slow progression of auditory and speech skills (21%), and resistance
to wearing the device (18%). One year postimplantation, benefits repo
rted by parents included environmental sound perception (76% of parent
s), speech perception (64%), and speech production (52%). Two years po
stimplantation, benefits reported by parents included perception of en
vironmental sounds (76% of parents), speech perception (67%), and spee
ch production (57%). Three years postimplantation, benefits reported i
ncluded perception of environmental sounds (61% of parents), speech pe
rception (78%), and speech production (74%). Postimplantation, 36%, 24
%, and 52% of the parents had no disadvantages to report at the 1, 2,
and 3-year intervals, respectively. At all postimplant intervals, disa
dvantages associated with the size and maintenance of equipment were l
isted most frequently (36%, 48%, and 22% of parents, respectively). Op
en-ended questionnaires may be useful when evaluating a child before o
r after cochlear implantation.