Jy. Kim et al., QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CONTROL CAPABILITY OF THE TRUNK MUSCLES DURING OSCILLATORY BENDING MOTION UNDER A NEW EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL, Clinical biomechanics, 11(7), 1996, pp. 385-391
Objective. A new quantitative technique for measuring the trunk contro
l capability/coordination was to be developed in this study. Design. F
itts' experimental paradigm was employed to quantify the information p
rocessing capacity (bits/s) of the trunk as well as dynamic motor perf
ormance such as velocity and acceleration during flexion and extension
. Background. The quantification of functional capability of the trunk
such as range of motion, strength, and endurance have been used to ev
aluate low back pain patient. Especially, dynamic trunk motion during
flexion and extension has been studied not only to quantify the severi
ty of the low-back impairment but to classify patients. Method. A lumb
ar motion monitor was used to record the time series of range of motio
n (RoM) and compute the velocity and acceleration of the trunk motion.
Twenty male subjects without any back pain in the past 6 months and p
revious history of back injury participated. Each subject performed 22
controlled flexion/extension at predetermined RoMs as well as one bal
listic trunk flexion/extension at a self-selected RoM. Results. The in
formation processing capacity of the trunk among healthy subjects was
found to have a mean of 4.23 (SD 1.43) bits/s based on Fitts' law. Als
o, the velocity of dynamic trunk motion was measured with a considerab
le reduction in intersubject variability when the RoMs were controlled
. A short but still accurate experimental protocol was suggested via a
series of statistical analyses to provide an objective and easy-to-us
e method to evaluate the functional capacity of low-back pain patients
. Relevance The information processing capacity may quantitatively rep
resent the functional deficit of neuromuscular system of the trunk. Al
so, this protocol provides the trunk velocity information with a small
er within group variability under controlled RoM. This method is expec
ted to increase the sensitivity and specificity in identifying the tru
nk performance of healthy subjects and LBP patients without exacerbati
ng the injury or pain due to an excessive exertion. Copyright (C) 1996
Elsevier Science Ltd.