We. Easterling et al., IMPROVING THE VALIDATION OF MODEL-SIMULATED CROP YIELD RESPONSE TO CLIMATE-CHANGE - AN APPLICATION TO THE EPIC MODEL, Climate research, 6(3), 1996, pp. 263-273
Crop models have been used extensively to simulate yield response to v
arious scenarios of climate change. Such simulations have been inadequ
ately validated, limiting their utility in policy analysis. In this re
search, it is argued that the performance of crop models during recent
years of extreme weather conditions relative to current normals may g
ive a better indication of the validity of model simulations of crop y
ields in response to climate change than performance during the full r
ange of climate conditions (as is done now). Twenty years of the clima
te record (1971-1990) are separated into different growing season temp
erature and precipitation classes (normal years, hot/cold extremes, we
t/dry extremes) for 7 weather stations in eastern Nebraska, USA. The E
rosion Productivity Impact Calculator (EPIC), a crop growth model, is
used to simulate crop yields with each of the above weather classes. S
tatistical comparisons are made between simulated yields, observed yie
lds and observed yields detrended of technology influences. Based on t
hese comparisons, we conclude that EPIC reliably simulates drop yields
under temperature extremes, some which approach the types of climate
conditions that may become more frequent with climate change. Simulati
ons with precipitation extremes are less reliable than with the temper
ature extremes but are argued still to be credible. Confidence in crop
simulations during years mimicking climate warming scenarios appears
warranted.