ELEVATED AMNIOTIC-FLUID INTERLEUKIN-6 LEVELS AT GENETIC AMNIOCENTESISPREDICT SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY LOSS

Citation
Kd. Wenstrom et al., ELEVATED AMNIOTIC-FLUID INTERLEUKIN-6 LEVELS AT GENETIC AMNIOCENTESISPREDICT SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY LOSS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 175(4), 1996, pp. 830-833
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
00029378
Volume
175
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Part
1
Pages
830 - 833
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(1996)175:4<830:EAILAG>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the proportion of pregnancy lo ss after genetic amniocentesis that is related to preexisting subclini cal intrauterine inflammation. STUDY DESIGN: We accessed our bank of s tored second-trimester amniotic fluid and maternal serum samples obtai ned from women undergoing genetic amniocentesis at our institution fro m 1988 to 1995 (N = 11,971). Interleukin-6 levels were measured by enz yme-linked immunosorbent assay in samples from every case resulting in spontaneous postprocedure loss (excluding fetal aneuploidy and anomal ies) within 30 days after the procedure (n = 66) and from 66 normal co ntrol women delivered at term and matched for year of test, gestationa l age, maternal age, and indication for amniocentesis. RESULTS: Mean m aternal serum interleukin-6 levels were the same in each group (0.02 /- 0.07 ng/ml for cases and 0.06 +/- 0.25 ng/ml for controls, p = 0.45 ). Mean amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels were higher in cases (4.0 +/- 13.1 ng/ml) than in controls (0.5 +/- 0.7 ng/ml, p = 0.04). The hi gher mean amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels in the cases resulted fr om the inclusion of eight very high values (greater than or equal to 3 SD or greater than or equal to 2.5 ng/ml). When these samples were ex cluded, the means and range of values were the same in each group (0.4 +/- 0.4 ng/ml for cases and 0.5 +/- 0.7 ng/ml for controls, p = 0.58) . Twelve percent (8/66) of the cases and 3% (2/66) of the controls had amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels greater than or equal to 2.5 ng/m l (p = 0.048, odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 31.2). Al though the overall correlation between maternal serum and amniotic flu id interleukin-6 levels was good (r = 0.50, p <0.002), only one of the eight cases would have been identified by a maternal serum interleuki n-6 level greater than or equal to 3 SD above the mean (greater than o r equal to 0.8 ng/ml). CONCLUSION: Analysis of our complete unselected group of postamniocentesis pregnancy losses indicates that up to 12% may result from preexisting subclinical intrauterine inflammation. Thi s inflammation is most likely localized and may not be identified by a maternal serum interleukin-6 level before the procedure.