Om. Alsulyman et al., CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF PRENATAL ULTRASONOGRAPHIC INTESTINAL DILATATION IN FETUSES WITH GASTROSCHISIS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 175(4), 1996, pp. 982-984
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical significance of in
testinal dilatation detected by prenatal ultrasonographic examination
in fetuses with gastroschisis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart rev
iew was performed of all patients cared for at Los Angeles County/Univ
ersity of Southern California Women's and children's Hospital with the
prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis over a 7-year period (1988 throug
h 1995). Patients were divided into two groups on he basis of the pres
ence or absence of ultrasonographically measured fetal bower diameter
of greater than or equal to 17 mm. Neonatal outcomes of the two groups
were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients met the entry criteria du
ring the study period. Fetuses with maximal bowel diameter of greater
than or equal to 17 mm did not have a longer time to full oral feeding
, a longer initial hospital stay, or a greater need for bowel resectio
n when compared with fetuses with a bower diameter <17 mm. Two newborn
s underwent bower resection because of intestinal atresia. Prenatal ul
trasonographic examination failed to show significant bowel dilatation
in either infant. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that prenatal evidence
of intestinal dilatation in fetuses with gastroschisis does not predi
ct immediate neonatal outcome. Thus this finding is not an appropriate
indication for preterm delivery in the absence of other evidence of f
etal compromise.