Jj. Froelich et al., LOCAL INTRAARTERIAL THROMBOLYSIS - IN-VITRO COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOMATIC AND MANUAL PULSE-SPRAY INFUSION, Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 19(6), 1996, pp. 423-427
Purpose: Manual and automatic pulse-spray infusion techniques are comp
ared in vitro to evaluate the efficacy of thrombolysis and the distrib
ution of urokinase and saline solution within thrombus using a pulse-s
pray catheter. Methods: A pulse-spray catheter was introduced into a h
uman thrombus within a stenotic how model. Automatic and manual pulsed
infusion of urokinase and automatic pulsed infusion of saline solutio
n were compared. To quantify the efficacy of thrombolysis, pressure gr
adients were recorded proximal and distal to the thrombus and during t
he course of infusion. Distribution of infused urokinase was assessed
radiographically. Results: The fastest and most homogeneous dissolutio
n of the thrombus was achieved with automatic pulsed infusion of uroki
nase, shown by decreasing transthrombotic pressure gradients (p < 0.00
1, Wilcoxon, matched pairs). Manual pulsed infusion of urokinase or sa
line solution resulted in inhomogeneous thrombus dissolution and delay
ed thrombolysis. Conclusion: Application of automatic pulse-spray inje
ctors seems beneficial for more effective and homogeneous intraarteria
l pulse-spray thrombolysis when compared with conventional manual puls
ed technique.