Ww. Hutz et al., COMPARISON OF VISCOELASTIC SUBSTANCES USED IN PHACOEMULSIFICATION, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 22(7), 1996, pp. 955-959
Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during
phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel
(R)), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat(R)),
1% sodium hyaluronate (Healon(R)), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon(R)
GV). Setting: Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany. Meth
ods: Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, re
ceived one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification a
nd posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were foll
owed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were me
asured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelasti
c: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocu
lar structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space ma
intaining ability, and removability and ease of injection. Results: Po
stoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four group
s. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the
phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surg
ery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better wi
th Healon and Healon GV. Conclusion: The high molecular weight viscoel
astics (Healon and Healon GV) performed better as viscosurgical tools
during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.