COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO DIFFERENT LIGHT-SOURCES (HE-NE-LASER, INGAAL DIODE-LASER, A SPECIFIC TYPE OF NONCOHERENT LED) ON SKIN BLOOD-FLOW OF THE HEAD
Pj. Pontinen et al., COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO DIFFERENT LIGHT-SOURCES (HE-NE-LASER, INGAAL DIODE-LASER, A SPECIFIC TYPE OF NONCOHERENT LED) ON SKIN BLOOD-FLOW OF THE HEAD, Acupuncture & electro-therapeutics research, 21(2), 1996, pp. 105-118
Background and Objective: This study assessed the effects of optic sti
muli emitted by three different light sources on head skin blood flow.
Materials and Methods: The irradiation effects of the He-Ne laser (63
2.8 nm, 10 mW, total energy appr. 9.4 J), the InGaAl diode laser (670
nm, 60 mW, appr. 108 J) and monochromatic light (635 nm, 112.5 mW, app
r. 202.5 J) were measured using laser Doppler technology. The correspo
nding fluences (energy densities) varied from 0.01 J/cm(2) (He-Ne) to
a range of 0.12 - 0.72 J/cm(2) (InGaAl) and 0.22 - 1.36 J/cm(2) (LED).
The investigation was completed under single-blind, placebo-controlle
d conditions where the subjects (10 male healthy volunteers) were expo
sed on two occasions to the placebo (LED)-device against the laser (He
-Ne or InGaAl). Results: A short lasting vasodilation, a 54 per cent i
ncrease (p<0.05) in skin blood flow was seen after the InGaAl irradiat
ion (fluences between 0.12 - 0.36 J/cm(2)) whereas the non-coherent mo
nochromatic irradiation (0.68 - 1.36 J/cm(2)) used in this particular
study decreased blood flow by 36 per cent (p<0.05). The He-Ne irradiat
ion (0.01 J/cm(2)) had no effect. Skin temperature changes were insign
ificant. Conclusions: Skin blood flow changes seemed to be related mor
e on radiant exposures than coherency.