Standard EM methods can be successfully used to reveal the various org
anelles of synaptic junctions in different insect species. The individ
ual junctions of a synaptic class exhibit a high level of morphologica
l stereotypy, but the study of serial sections is generally necessary
to understand the different appearances of a junction's profiles when
it is cut in different planes. Most synaptic profiles seen in single s
ections may then be attributed to one or a few morphological classes,
not to many. Probably most central synapses are of the multiple-contac
t type, containing a number of postsynaptic elements, with the diversi
ty of the combinations of these providing the major difference between
particular synaptic junctions. The different profiles of a synapse wh
en cut serially in oblique, non-canonical section planes provide the i
nvestigator with search images, prior knowledge of which is needed for
a comprehensive identification of synaptic sites in single sections.
The latter can be used to describe the synaptic organization of an unk
nown neuropile from the variety of synaptic contacts that form between
different neurons. This requires that continuity be established betwe
en a postsynaptic dendrite and its parent axon, and that the position
of the axon can then be used to identify the neuron of origin. Tracing
between dendrite and axon can be undertaken either systematically in
serial sections of a restricted region or by protracted searches of si
ngle sections. The number of synaptic profiles in a single section can
be used to estimate the number of synaptic contacts, either in relati
ve terms, as the number of profiles per section in different cells, or
as the absolute number of synapses per cell. The latter requires use
of correction formulae, taking into account the influence of section t
hickness and of the mean size of the synaptic junction on the number o
f synaptic profiles recorded in a particular section.