R. Laibovitz et al., DORZOLAMIDE VERSUS PILOCARPINE AS ADJUNCTIVE THERAPIES TO TIMOLOL - ACOMPARISON OF PATIENT PREFERENCE AND IMPACT ON DAILY-LIFE, Clinical therapeutics, 18(5), 1996, pp. 821-832
The purpose of this study was to compare 2% dorzolamide three times da
ily with 2% pilocarpine four times daily to determine patient preferen
ce, tolerability, and impact on daily life in patients concurrently re
ceiving 0.5% timolol twice daily for treatment of elevated intraocular
pressure (IOP). Seventy-five patients were enrolled in this 4-week, r
andomized, two-period, crossover study. The Comparison of Ophthalmic M
edications for Tolerability questionnaire was used to assess patient p
reference and perception of side effects and activity limitations resu
lting from the study medications. IOP measurements were obtained 2 hou
rs after drops were instilled and visual field tests were performed at
baseline and at the end of each crossover period. Significantly more
patients receiving pilocarpine than dorzolamide reported adverse exper
iences and discontinued the drug because of these adverse experiences.
Similarly, patients reported more interference with their daily life
because of side effects and activity limitations when receiving piloca
rpine. Vision difficulties, accommodation difficulties, and brow ache
were reported more often and were considered more bothersome by patien
ts receiving pilocarpine. Bitter/unusual taste was reported more frequ
ently and was considered more bothersome by patients receiving dorzola
mide. Patients also reported missing fewer doses and were more satisfi
ed with their medication when receiving dorzolamide. All of these chan
ges were considered statistically significant. IOP control was not sig
nificantly differ ent with either dorzolamide or pilocarpine. However,
patients experienced a significant worsening of the mean defect of au
tomated visual field examinations when receiving pilocarpine. At the e
nd of the study, among patients with a preference, dorzolamide was pre
ferred to pilocarpine by a ratio of more than 9:1. Overall, 81.9% of p
atients preferred dorzolamide. Thus dorzolamide demonstrated better to
lerability and less adverse impact on daily life than pilocarpine.