A considerable number of quotational inaccuracies have been detected i
n medical and surgical publications in the past. Our study investigate
d the quotational accuracy of selected references of 32 scientific pub
lications in six anesthesia journals referring to a single article pub
lished in a 1973 issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. In four
(12.5%) articles, the quotation was in contradiction to the primary au
thor's statement; in 15 (46.9%) articles, it was selective; and in 13
(40.6%) publications, it was in complete agreement with the important
statements made in the original article. These results suggest that qu
otational inaccuracy is also evident in neuroanesthesio-logic research
. This problem deserves increased attention by authors as well as by r
eviewers and journal editors.