Se. Litwiller et al., POSTPROSTATECTOMY INCONTINENCE AND THE ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER -A LONG-TERM STUDY OF PATIENT SATISFACTION AND CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS, The Journal of urology, 156(6), 1996, pp. 1975-1980
Purpose: We investigated patient satisfaction with the artificial urin
ary sphincter and established criteria for a successful outcome by inq
uiring about patient perceived satisfaction, continence achieved and c
omparison with the surgeon office records. Materials and Methods: Duri
ng 9 years 65 patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence underwent
placement of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter. Review of chart
s and a telephone questionnaire were conducted to determine patient pe
rceived satisfaction. Results: A total of 50 patients participated in
the survey. Median followup was 23.4 months. Preoperative incontinence
was severe. Of the patients 90% reported continuous leakage, and 70%
wore an average of 6 diapers and 24% wore an average of 7.4 pads daily
. The long-term complete continence rate was 20%. Of the patients with
wetness 55% had leakage of a few drops daily and 22% had leakage of l
ess than a teaspoon. Of all patients 50% had leakage daily, 24% had le
akage 1 or more times a week and wore an average of 1.5 pads per day,
and 6% reported changing clothes due to wetness. A total of 90% of the
patients reported satisfaction with the artificial urinary sphincter
and 96% stated that they would recommend or had recommended the artifi
cial urinary sphincter to a friend. In retrospect, 92% of the patients
would have the artificial urinary sphincter placed again, 90% of thos
e undergoing revision reported no change in satisfaction and 14% repor
ted improved sexual activity. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with t
he artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence is
uniformly high. Although postoperative continence was not 100%, relat
ive improvement in continence was the most significant factor affectin
g patient perceived outcome. Using these parameters criteria for a suc
cessful outcome can be established, and patient concerns regarding the
artificial urinary sphincter can be dispelled.