Dk. Montague et al., CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL ON ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION - SUMMARY REPORT ONTHE TREATMENT OF ORGANIC ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION, The Journal of urology, 156(6), 1996, pp. 2007-2011
Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Clinical Gui
delines Panel on Erectile Dysfunction to analyze the literature regard
ing available methods for treating organic erectile dysfunction and to
make practice recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. M
aterials and Methods: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all
articles from 1979 through 1994 on treatment of organic erectile dysf
unction and meta-analyzed outcomes data for oral drug therapy (yohimbi
ne), vacuum constriction devices, vasoactive drug injection therapy, p
enile prosthesis implantation and venous and arterial surgery. Results
: Estimated probabilities of desirable outcomes are relatively high fo
r vacuum constriction devices, vasoactive drug injection therapy and p
enile prosthesis therapy. However, patients must be aware of potential
complications. The outcomes data for yohimbine clearly indicate a the
rapy with marginal efficacy. For venous and arterial surgery, based on
reported outcomes, chances of success do not appear high enough to ju
stify routine use of such surgery. Conclusions: For the standard patie
nt, defined as a man with acquired organic erectile dysfunction and no
evidence of hypogonadism or hyperprolactinemia, the panel recommends
3 treatment alternatives: vacuum constriction devices, vasoactive drug
injection therapy and penile prosthesis implantation. Based on the da
ta to date, yohimbine does not appear to be effective for organic erec
tile dysfunction and, thus, it should not be recommended as treatment
for the standard patient. Venous surgery and arterial surgery in men w
ith arteriolosclerotic disease are considered investigational and shou
ld be performed only in a research setting with long-term followup ava
ilable.