L. Ostergaard et al., DIAGNOSIS OF UROGENITAL CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS INFECTION IN WOMEN BASED ON MAILED SAMPLES OBTAINED AT HOME - MULTIPRACTICE COMPARATIVE-STUDY, BMJ. British medical journal, 313(7066), 1996, pp. 1186-1189
Objective-To compare urine and vaginal flush samples collected by wome
n at home with endocervical and urethral swabs obtained by general pra
ctitioners for their efficacy in the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia
trachomatis infection. Design-Multipractice comparative study. Settin
g-33 general practices and a central department of clinical microbiolo
gy in Aarhus County, Denmark. Subjects-222 women aged 18-25 years who
for any reason had a gynaecological examination. Interventions-Endocer
vical and urethral swabs were obtained by the women's general practiti
oners. The same women when at home then collected a first void urine s
ample, a midstream urine sample, and a vaginal flush sample (using a v
aginal pipette) and mailed them to the laboratory. Main outcome measur
es-C trachomatis detected by the polymerase chain reaction and the lig
ase chain reaction. Eight tests for C trachomatis were performed for e
very woman. When two of the eight yielded positive results the patient
was considered infected. Results-The overall prevalence of C trachoma
tis infection was 11.2% (23/205 women). Test sensitivities in samples
obtained by general practitioners, samples obtained at home subjected
to polymerase chain reaction, and samples obtained at home subjected t
o ligase chain reaction were 91%, 96%, and 100% respectively. The corr
esponding specificities were 100%, 92.9%, and 99.5%. Conclusions-The d
iagnostic efficacy of samples obtained by women at home acid mailed to
the laboratory was as good as for samples obtained by a general pract
itioner when using the ligase chain reaction. This may have important
implications for the practicability of screening for this common, ofte
n asymptomatic, and treatable infection.