K. Cadenhead et al., CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICALLY PSYCHOSISPRONE COLLEGE-STUDENTS, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 30(5), 1996, pp. 331-340
The study of individuals at the boundaries of schizophrenia has histor
ically involved genetic relatives of schizophrenia patients or individ
uals who meet criteria for schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). Rec
ently, many investigators have turned to the use of psychometric scale
s, developed to measure psychotic traits or vulnerability to developin
g schizophrenia, to screen large populations of college students in or
der to identify individuals who are ''psychosis prone'' or ''schizotyp
al'', To help answer the question of whether students identified with
psychometric scales are indeed psychosis prone, we screened 1115 colle
ge students with the Perceptual Aberration/ Magical Ideation (PerMag)
and Physical Anhedonia (PhysAn) Scales. Individuals who scored 2 stand
ard deviations (SD) above the mean on the scales were selected as expe
rimental subjects (N=13 PerMag, N=10 PhysAn) and a subpopulation of ma
tched subjects who scored less than 0.5 SD above the mean were selecte
d as control subjects (N=24). All subjects then received a full batter
y of tests, including structured clinical interviews, the MMPI, and ps
ychophysiological measures of information processing, including prepul
se inhibition and habituation of the human startle response, visual ba
ckward masking and reaction time measures. The results suggest that th
e PerMag scale, but not the PhysAn scale, identifies individuals with
some psychotic, affective and anxiety symptoms when compared to the co
ntrols. Neither scale predicts a diagnosis of schizotypal personality
disorder or deficits on measures of information processing that charac
terize schizophrenia or schizotypal personality disordered patients. C
opyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.