RELATIONSHIP OF THE ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES TO CHANGES INARTICULAR STATUS AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS

Citation
J. Husted et al., RELATIONSHIP OF THE ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES TO CHANGES INARTICULAR STATUS AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS, Journal of rheumatology, 23(11), 1996, pp. 1932-1937
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0315162X
Volume
23
Issue
11
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1932 - 1937
Database
ISI
SICI code
0315-162X(1996)23:11<1932:ROTAIM>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objective. To examine the relationship of the Arthritis Impact Measure ment Scales (AIMS) to changes in articular status and functional perfo rmance in a group of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods. The AIMS was administered to 65 patients attending the University of Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Clinic in 1989 and in 1993. Clinical and l aboratory assessments of function, active inflammation, and damage wer e also performed at these 2 clinic visits. Linear regression analysis was performed to relate changes in the number of actively inflamed joi nts and number of deformed joints to ALMS measurements, while logistic regression was used to relate the American College of Rheumatology (A CR) functional class and the AIMS scores taken at the 2 clinic visits. Results, There were 27 women and 38 men with a mean age of 46 years a nd arthritis duration of 13 years. Based only on information derived f rom the AIMS questionnaire, the maximum percentage of variation explai ned was 21 and 9% for the number of active joints and deformed joints, respectively. . The strongest relationship was between the pain compo nent scales measured at the 2 visits and the number of active joints, In all cases the initial clinical value made a significant additional contribution to the regression. Conclusion. The finding that the AIMS was sensitive to articular changes that occurred in patients over a 4 year period provides further support for the utility of the AIMS as an outcome measure in clinical studies of PsA. However, changes in the A IMS did not capture the full extent of the changes in both articular s tatus and ACR functional class. This suggests that the AIMS and tradit ional measures of disease activity and function assess somewhat differ ent aspects of clinical status and that it may be beneficial to use bo th types of measures in monitoring the course of PsA.