P. Tucker et al., COMPARISON OF 8 AND 12 HOUR SHIFTS - IMPACTS ON HEALTH, WELL-BEING, AND ALERTNESS DURING THE SHIFT, Occupational and environmental medicine, 53(11), 1996, pp. 767-772
Objectives - The generally agreed view is that there is no ideal shift
system, and that most systems will have both advantages and disadvant
ages. As such, attention has been placed on trying to identify good an
d bad features of shift systems, with a view to minimising the possibl
e ill health as a consequence of shiftwork. The present study focuses
on the duration of the shift and looks at the implications for individ
ual health, wellbeing, and alertness during the shift of extending the
shift from the traditional eight hours to 12. Methods - Two groups of
chemical workers, one working 12 hour shifts and the other working ei
ght hour shifts, took part. All completed a modified version of the st
andard shiftwork index (SSI), a set of self reported questionnaires re
lated to health and wellbeing. Results - The two groups did not differ
on most outcome measures, although the differences that did exist sug
gested advantages for the 12 hour shift workers over the eight hour sh
ift workers; with the notable exception of rated alertness at certain
times of day. Conclusions - The results are explained in terms of the
design of the 12 hour shift system and the specific sequencing of shif
ts that seem to minimise the potential for the build up of fatigue. Al
though the current data moderately favour 12 hour shifts, a cautionary
note is sounded with regard to the implications of the alertness rati
ngs for performance and safety.